<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Famous 100,000 Consecutive Omega 561 Chronometers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/2009/01/the-famous-100000-consecutive-omega-561-chronometers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/2009/01/the-famous-100000-consecutive-omega-561-chronometers/</link>
	<description>Vintage, Military, and Omega Watch Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rrryan</title>
		<link>http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/2009/01/the-famous-100000-consecutive-omega-561-chronometers/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Rrryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/?p=220#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Gary - I&#039;m so very glad to hear it&#039;s found a good home.  I still miss that one occasionally when I&#039;m looking for a good &quot;going out&quot; watch, and the Dynamic seems unsurpassed in that role so far.  And of course it had that underrated high-grade movement driving it to boot. ;)

And congrats on owning such a distinctive Constellation too!  You&#039;re a fortunate collector indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; I&#8217;m so very glad to hear it&#8217;s found a good home.  I still miss that one occasionally when I&#8217;m looking for a good &#8220;going out&#8221; watch, and the Dynamic seems unsurpassed in that role so far.  And of course it had that underrated high-grade movement driving it to boot. ;)</p>
<p>And congrats on owning such a distinctive Constellation too!  You&#8217;re a fortunate collector indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/2009/01/the-famous-100000-consecutive-omega-561-chronometers/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/?p=220#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great info Ryan. I&#039;ve discovered my cal 561Connie falls within the 100000 serial number range. It sits in my watch box next to the Geneve Dynamic I got from you last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great info Ryan. I&#8217;ve discovered my cal 561Connie falls within the 100000 serial number range. It sits in my watch box next to the Geneve Dynamic I got from you last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedmaster</title>
		<link>http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/2009/01/the-famous-100000-consecutive-omega-561-chronometers/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/?p=220#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Wow, impressive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, impressive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/2009/01/the-famous-100000-consecutive-omega-561-chronometers/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ialreadyhaveawatch.com/?p=220#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Neat write-up, Ryan.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat write-up, Ryan.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

