Skip to content

The Famous ‘Rose Gold’ Finish on Vintage Omega Movements: Not All that Glitters…

Omega Caliber 564 movement circa 1968 with the famous "Rose Gold" copper finish.

Omega Caliber 564 movement circa 1968 with the famous "Rose Gold" copper finish.

In talking recently with another collector not as familiar with Omegas I was reminded of something that I haven’t seen mentioned lately: the discredited but oddly persistent myth of the “rose gold” finish on vintage Omega movements.

If you’ve been under the mistaken impression that those beautiful old vintage Omega movements were plated with rose gold, don’t feel bad. You’re hardly alone. Many collectors, watchmakers, and even Omega staff sometimes seem to suffer from the same misconception that “rose gold” finish contains actual gold content. In the initial January 2007 press release announcing the new 8500/8501 “in town” calibers, Omega appeared to be under the same misconception:

“In the case of the Calibre 8501, the rotor and balance bridge are fashioned out of 18 Ct red gold. The presence of 18 Ct red gold components is reminiscent of OMEGA’s rich watch making heritage as historically, red gold had been used in OMEGA movements.”

Sorry, Omega. That famous iconic “rose gold” finish for which vintage Omega movements became known actually didn’t contain any gold at all.

There are various reason for the persistence of the myth. It does admittedly look very much like rose gold. And perhaps there is some simple confusion with special calibers like the 863 that actually did have gold finishing.

Perhaps part of the reason too is just out of simple convention or convenience, or using “red gold” simply to refer to the coloration. But not all that glitters is gold.

Exasperated with the continued myth, collectors Paul Delury and Rob Berkavicius finally got together years ago to put it to the test. They sent samples of Omega parts to a metallurgical lab for a deliberate analysis.

After etching the parts with nitric acid and examining them under magnification, the metallurgist quickly determined that the finish was not gold at all:

of similar composition, consisting of a brass-like body thinly coated with copper. The brasss-like body is unusually hard and tough, and is believed to be beryllium bronze, a copper-base alloy continisng 2.25% beryllium; this alloy responds to temper-hardening, devleoping great hardness after suitable treatment… No gold was identified.

Link: “All That Glitters? – Rob Berkavicius (Rob B)

Posted in Omega Watches, Vintage Watches.

Tagged with , .

3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Daniel Howe says

    I was trying to ask a question about the ‘Definitive Guide…”, but could not find any way to leave a comment there….so here goes…

    Does winding an automatic on a regular basis cause any damage, e.g., my vintage Omega runs down over the weekend, or if I don’t wear it for a couple of days. A watch winder is a solution, but what if I just wind it fully (15 winding turns) on Sat and Sun night so it is still running on Monday morning?

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Vintage and least for me... PART TWO ... linked to this post on 15 February 2013

    […] mean I love the colour of the movement and wanted to know what THAT comprised of … here's a detailed answer I found. (plated beryllium bronze thinly coated with copper) …and thanks for asking. Until you did and […]

  2. Clueless new guy with a vintage Constellation. linked to this post on 02 July 2016

    […] to reveal the underlying copper(?) finish. A copper alloy, quite similar to rose gold in colour:The Famous ‘Rose Gold’ Finish on Vintage Omega Movements: Not All that Glitters… &#821… Grease? Good. I was immediately concerned about the bridges, since a lot of Omegas that show up in […]

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.