Chinese Fake Seamaster 300. Note the "SeaNaster" text on the dial. Close, but not quite.
It’s a harsh reality that the Chinese are getting getting better at churning out fakes all the time. And sadly it seems the fakes just took another step forward.
For Omega and military watch collectors the perfidity of fakes is perhaps one of the most lamentable thing about the SM300, which is otherwise a very desirable and collectible watch. They Royal Navy issued Seamaster 300 is perhaps one of the most faked military watches ever, and as the number of Seamster 300s issued by the British is generally believed to be less than 2000 or so the of fakes certainly outnumber the genuine article.
Unfortunately the fakes are so pervasive that would-be buyers are filled with trepidation, artificially depressing pricing. Once at get-together once filled with the collectors of high-end vintage sport Rolex models I saw one collector offer another $80k for a Rolex GMT Master, and then to my astonishment saw the other collector actually decline. And even in this environment every Rolex collector I spoke with expressed an admiration for the Seamaster 300 and a desire to buy one, except that they were very wary of the fakes and everyone seemed to know someone who had been burned.
In perhaps one of the more famous instance of a fake being mistaken as an original, in its “Omegamania” thematic auction in April 2007 auctioneer Antiquorum actually sold a fake for over $30k despite collector outcry leading up to the sale. And that example (lot 128) had apparently even been handled by Omega factory service prior to the sale, as it seemed to have been fitted with genuine hands.
Below are the photos. I apologize about the seller’s watermark on the images and there’s little I can do about them. It does at least serve the purpose of warning would-be buyers away from the seller though.
Chinese Fake Seamaster 300. Note the "SeaNaster" text on the dial. Close, but not quite.
Laser engravings on a vintage watch? Don't think so, guys.
An actual military Seamaster 300 issued by the Royal Navy would have had fixed bars instead of springbars.
Side profile
Movement is all wrong, should be a cal. 55x. Bizarrely it seems to be a faked generic ETA movement and is even marked as such instead of "Omega."
They’ve fixed some of the more glaring problems. Gone are the “stubbies” and the closed 6 and 9 that are so easy to spot, but there are still some faults that can be spotted even without much expertise. A quick rundown of some of the more obvious problems:
Dial: pretty close compared to previous fakes, but the biggest telltale is that the “m” in Seamaster is improperly formed and looks almost like Seanaster. Otherwise the dial is getting frighteningly close.
Caseback: obvious laser engravings, which are of course grossly anachronistic on watch of supposed late ’60s – early ’70s manufacture. Also lacks the military issue markings altogether, which would conceivable be called for by the “circle T” indication on the dial.
Movement: this one is a dead giveaway of course; it looks absolutely nothing like the copper-plated cal. 55x/56x movements that appeared in the originals. Oddly, it seems to be a cheap copy of an Swiss ETA movement. It’s beyond me why they bothered, or at least why they didn’t just go on and mark “Omega” on it vs. replicating the ETA cartouche.* If they ever start frankening these with vintage movements they’re going to get harder to spot. *[EDIT: Actually, I was mistaken here. It actually seems to be a genuine Swiss ETA movement, but of course is still incorrect.]
So, you’ll have to do your homework before purchasing one of these but with just a little bit of study the fakes can still be spotted, even if they’re getting better all the time.
Links:
loading...
Related posts:
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.